
I understand that each dating site tries to distinguish itself from others and each has a "gimmick" that they use, or a different set of criteria that you can enter to select a potential date. I just think a number of the sites go too far!
A while back, OkCupid decided to hook up with a scientific matching company to find potential dates based on DNA. Apparently after a lot of negative feedback from users, they announced that they had nixed that idea. When I looked, though, there are a number of other dating sites, many in Europe, who are using this technology.
Read more about DNA matching and dating
Plenty of Fish just started displaying two new categories on user's profiles: "Smarts" and if the user owns a car! The "Smarts" categoryis filled in by a field where the user records their highest level of education! As a Master's student, I can attest that the amount of education a person has clearly does not equate to "smarts"! In fact, studies have shown that Ph.D.'s do NOT score higher on IQ tests - they only show a higher level of persistence! As for owning a car, what about the cities full of people who use public transportation and CHOSE not to own one! Talk about narrow-mindedness on the part of these website designers!
Match.com also has a bunch of wacky categories that you can complete to indicate what you would like or not like in a potential mate. So many of those things, though, are circumstantial. Take tattoos or piercings for instance. I happen to have a small tattoo that is not highly visible. I placed it in a spot that could be covered if I chose to. It's a part of my personal identify and I got it for me. I'm not covered in tattoos and everyone who has seen mine has complimented me on it. I don't have any piercings, but I know plenty of people who have one or two small piercings that are barely noticeable or are hidden by clothes. So, if a person indicates that they don't like tattoos or piercings - we, my friends and I, appear to be less desirable mates than those who indicate that they don't have tattoos or piercings! It's ridiculous that someone would make a judgment about dating someone based on that kind of singular answer.
Another item Match.com has in their criteria is whether or not you find thunderstorms to be a "turn-on" or a "turn-off". C'mon people! Are you really going to toss someone to the side because they hate thunderstorms!
What other craziness exists out there? I'm interesting in hearing from readers their experiences or observations of ridiculous selection criteria used by dating sites.

Photo courtesy of Deviant Art